Reading The Art of Spending Money by Morgan Housel inspired this thought. And it felt like this was the heart of, not the book, but my interpretation. It was like, this is the idea to organize your actions around.
The closer something is to money, the less value it contains.
Like a Venn diagram, the more a thing overlaps with money, the less ultimate value it has.
Money as the first example. Money is money. Complete overlap. Money is good but because of the things it allows, not itself. You can’t eat money. You can’t stick your toes in money, well you can but it doesn’t feel like sand at the beach.
Nouns can be a second example. Money buys food, which leads to sharing meals. Money buys pickleball paddles, which leads to time exercising, laughing, and seeing friends. Money buys cars, which travel to beaches where there is sand.
Verbs. Money pays people to landscape, which leads to time with family. Money pays for tax services, especially this time of year. Money pays for haircuts, which help us feel better.
This frame of money is so heavily tilted by JTBD theory and Early Retirement Extreme I can’t get away from it.
Both JTBD and ERE point past the initial assumption and ask what’s really the goal?
And both rely on creativity to find a solution which leads to that goal.
Now, thanks to Morgan Housel, there’s a question to ask when making choices: What is this proximity to money? If it’s close, it’s probably not what I want.
