Sometimes we just need the right word to explain an idea which leads to action. Having a name for a thing changes the way we think about it. These are some of my favorites from the Wharton Moneyball podcast.
Let’s be precise. For instance, what does herd immunity mean? Often we are not precise.
What’s the effect size? There are a lot of things we could do, but which matter most?
Short the narrative. In sports there’s a narrative that drives the stories. Often the narrative is overpriced.
The most parsimonious explanation. I can never remember if it’s Hanlon’s or Occam’s razor. This and ‘short the narrative’ pair well together, like the blades of a scissors.
Mean reversion. Outcomes are combinations of skill and luck. Skill mostly persists, luck mostly does not, hence the Madden Curse. But(!!) skill isn’t static. If one player has a great year, the next year they might have a better year because while their luck component contracts, their skill share expands.
Tennis variance. Fewer events means more variance. Tennis events, like the Olympics, may have more upsets. This could also be part-of-the-reason there are more dominant men than women.
Update my priors. To change ones view with information. It’s being Bayesian.
It was fiction that focused the idea of names.