Supported by Greenhaven Road Capital, finding value off the beaten path.
For your listening pleasure.
https://soundcloud.com/mikesnotes/the-pixar-business-story/s-xi19G
Here’s an ePub, a PDF, and here’s a sample:
Pixar’s business success is a good lesson, but not for the reason you might expect. It’s a story with a happy ending but it’s a cautionary tale; this is everything that has to go right.
At TheWaitersPad.com we look at podcasts, videos, and books to learn lessons. That’s what we’ll do here, Pixar’s history and lessons in under an hour.
First a warning. There are no heroes in this book, only people. Some will appear wiser than others, but everyone was locally logical. The ‘dumbasses’ had succeeded while the times had changed. The ‘visionaries’ rode the winds of luck and skill.
We’ll draw mostly from Ed Catmull’s Creativity Inc. and Lawrence Levy’s To Pixar and Beyond. Catmull co-founded Pixar and still works there. Levy IPO’d Pixar and has moved on to new projects. Between these two – and a scattering of other sources – we’ll see how everything broke right.
The history book on the shelf, Is always repeating itself. — ABBA’s Waterloo, 1974
In 1974 Catmull graduated with a computer science Ph.D. and “a nice list of innovations under my belt.” He worked in New York and got his first taste managing a group that wasn’t grad students. “Once Alex (Schure) brought me in (to the New York Institute of Technology), he left it to me to assemble a team. I had to give that to him: He had total confidence in the people he hired.” This early example of a decentralized command would go on to be something Catmull made central to Pixar. He wrote about New York, “giving a ton of freedom to highly self-motivated people enabled us to make some significant technological leaps in a short time.” David Ogilvy advised the same thing, suggesting people hire “gentlemen with brains.
In 1977 Star Wars premiered and by 1979 Catmull worked for George Lucas in Marin County California. It was one hour north of Silicon Valley by car, and one hour north of Hollywood by plane. Lucas moved there because “he thought there was something a bit unseemly and inbred about it (Hollywood).” There, Catmull was able to continue his work. “The resulting environment felt as protected as an academic institution.”
Having space to focus helped Ken Burns too, who told entrepreneur.com, “I don’t live in Los Angeles or New York City. I live in a tiny village in New Hampshire, which permits us to do the deep dives, to do the necessary research and keep the sanity in the course of a 10-plus-year project.” Some paths require someone to be in a place; New York for finance, Silicon Valley for computers, Detroit (formerly) for auto. Other times the insidiousness makes doing new things hard.
In 1983 George Lucas was going through a divorce and sold the company in 1986 to Steve Jobs for five million dollars and a promise to invest five million more (it would go on to be fifty million more). Catmull reflected that his conversations with Steve Jobs were like the Maxwell Cassette commercial. Steve Jobs was the speaker, everyone else was the guy.
Pixar’s product was the Pixar Imaging Computer and Catmull was president of a hardware company. “There’s nothing quite like ignorance combined with a driving need to succeed to force rapid learning.” Today we can ‘Google it’ and Catmull did the 1986 equivalent, he visited the library. However, the needles of good advice were buried in haystacks of platitudes. Simple questions like ‘What to price our computer for?’ “had distracted me and kept me from asking more fundamental questions.” This led to one of the most valuable lessons from the early days of Pixar.
The Waiter's Pad 
[…] Thanks for reading. More Pixar here. […]
LikeLike
[…] don’t.” They should also have “shared values and complementary skills.” We saw this with Pixar’s story. Steve Jobs worked well with Ed Catmull and Lawrence Levy while he butted heads with Michael […]
LikeLike
[…] This works in media at places like Seinfeld, The Simpsons, and Pixar. […]
LikeLike
[…] where they could do their best work. Britian created a gold medal culture. Culture is what kept Pixar from being copied. Culture, wrote Peter Thiel, isn’t something you have. It’s something […]
LikeLike
[…] might be transitioning from an age of middlemen to an age of sharing. Like with our study of Pixar, we should keep in mind that middlemen aren’t bad/stupid/unnecessary. They’re a product […]
LikeLike
[…] posts on Michael Ovitz, Pixar, and Streaming, Sharing, Stealing we’ll add Powerhouse/ CAA to our media […]
LikeLike
[…] is part-of-the-reason for movie windows and why things bundle and unbundle. Chris Dixon wrote in 2012 “The benefits of bundled […]
LikeLike
[…] This story is playing out today too as companies experiment with monetizing content. Making movies is a terribly hard business (hence Jason Blum’s angle). However, making movies and then selling character meetings (via theme park tickets), t-shirts, and stuffed animals is a much better business. Hence, The Pixar Business Story: […]
LikeLike
[…] like movies and restaurants, is a difficult business. If potential profits weren’t enough, social glamour […]
LikeLike
[…] was the Pixar problem. Their movie investments only paid off if their movies were always awesome. One slip was […]
LikeLike
[…] the story of Barefoot Wine, and a history of looking at difficult businesses like movies, and restaurants, it seemed appropriate to think about selling wine. Wine-making pays in profits […]
LikeLike
[…] Legendary Entertainment in the early 2000s. We’ve noted here that some businesses like movies, wine, and restaurants tend to be terrible options because they pay in profit and prestige. […]
LikeLike
[…] Movies are an interesting business. Some things have changed, but others haven’t. For marketers who better target customers, it’s a fuller theater. We’ll give the last word to Robert McKee, “For writers who can tell a quality story, it’s a seller’s market—always has been, always will be.” […]
LikeLike
[…] Movies, wine, investing, and sports all offer financial and psychic income. That’s a double dose of the market mechanism once someone sniffs out the potential rewards. A cooler choice might be digging pools. […]
LikeLike
[…] case study. In part because of the accessibility, everyone has can cook something. So much like making movies or winning wines there’s a fair bit of “I’ve seen that done so I could do […]
LikeLike
[…] Artists lose money recording an album, break even touring, and profit from the merchandise. This had to be Pixar’s business too. Division three soccer teams lose money, division two teams break even, and La Liga or Premier […]
LikeLike